I try to keep my blog posts as short as possible and will
attempt to do the same thing on this one. However, this subject can be a little
more complicated.
 |
Photo form nydailynew.com |
I think we all remember President Obama’s minister,
Rev. Jeremiah Wright, during the
last democratic primaries. Wright became a household name after most American
media outlets released a very
controversial sermon
given by Wright inside his Chicago church. Wright’s
church was founded on the vision of
Black liberation theology.
A combination of the controversial sermon and association with Black liberation
theology by Wright caused an outcry for Obama to distance himself or disavow
his church and pastor of twenty years. The outcry came from both, Obama’s
constituents and conservative media outlets. After a controversial
National Press Club speech
by Wright, Obama had no choice but to leave his church and cut ties with Rev.
Wright in a passionate speech called “
A More Perfect Union” in
Philadelphia.
Now, this brings me to
Prophet
Joseph Smith, Jr. Smith is the founder of the
Latter
Day Saints movement, which gave rise to the modern day
Mormon theology. To conserve
space on this post, I’m not going to go into all the
questionable
beliefs of Mormons and
practices and
beliefs Mormons have had about people of African descent. However, I will
point out that until 1978, the Mormon church (The Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-day Saints- LDS), had a policy in place that prohibited people of
African descent from becoming priests and participating in temple ceremonies. Why?
Mormons believe[d] black skin was a curse by God.
 |
Photo from facebook.com |
The
leadership
structure of the church consists of a First Presidency, Quorum of the
Twelve, Area Presidencies, Stake Presidency, Bishop / Branch President, and Family
(members). This doesn’t appear to be too strange. However, the First Presidency
is comprised of two counselors and the President of the Church who also serves
as a
modern-day living
prophet (
Thomas S.
Monson) in the likes of Noah, Abraham, and Moses. Now, that’s where it gets
strange.
Herein lies my issue. My understanding is that Mormons have
to follow the word of the prophet because the prophet is in direct
communication with God and is only delivering the word of God. Now, that could
be positive in the way that in 1978 the prophet received from God that it was
okay for people of African descent to be priests and participate in temple
ceremonies. The scary part of this is what if the prophet receives word that is
not so positive or not in line with American moral beliefs. Either way, conventional wisdom suggests that Mormons have to follow the word from the prophet. In other words, because
Mormons have a living prophet, it is impossible for a Mormon to truly separate
church and state. No matter what the situation, the word from the modern-day
prophet will always trump the Constitution of the United States and the
American judicial system. Hence, a Mormon politician is bound to his prophet, not
to the Constitution or his constituents.
 |
Photo from realclearpolitic.com |
The current Republican Party frontrunner, and Republican
establishment favorite, for President of the United States,
Mitt Romney, is a proud and
devout Mormon and believed to be or have been in the upper hierarchy of the LDS church. Now,
Obama’s minister, Rev. Wright, may have said some things that some believed to
be inflammatory; but by no means was he a prophet and he never claimed to be one. Black
liberation theology is not a religion- it’s a set of principles. Obama
worshiped in and Rev. Wright preached to a Christian congregation. With all
that being said, there are a few questions on the table: where is the outcry from
Romney’s constituents and the liberal media for Romney to publically disavow
his modern-day prophet Thomas S. Monson (so he can govern freely) and the
outcry for him to distance himself from a church or theology that believe[d]
people of African descent were/are cursed by God? Obama had to do it while he was
still a candidate. Why not Romney?
It is obvious that the LDS church and Mormonism are a lot
more controversial than a Christian church on the south side of Chicago founded
on the vision of Black liberation theology. For purposes of length, I didn’t
discuss the history of polygamy associated with Mormonism or the association
with cosmology and other questionable beliefs or practices. Is there something more cynical here
as to why there’s an absence of media and constituent outcry for Romney
to distance himself? Wth?...
Related Articles:
Concerns about Romney's Mormonism...
Romney's Mormon Problem
Why Mitt Romney Can't Be The Mormon...
Mitt Romney's Evangelical Problem